| Item | Scale |
| Role of TA: Select All Applicable
|
N/A |
| Quality of Teaching | 5 Point Scale |
| 1. TA's oral communication skills | Very Poor ? Exceptional |
| 2. TA's written communication skills | Very Poor ? Exceptional |
| 3. TA explained course concepts clearly | Strongly Disagree ? Strongly Agree |
| 4. TA's familiarity with course concepts | Very Poor ? Exceptional |
| 5. TA's respect for students | Very Poor ? Exceptional |
| 6. TA's attitude about their teaching role in this course | Detached ? Extremely Enthusiastic |
| 7. TA stimulated my interest in the subject matter | Ruined My Interest ? Made Me Eager to Learn More |
| 8. TA was approachable for assistance in this course | Strongly Disagree ? Strongly Agree |
| 9. TA's level of preparedness | Completely Unprepared ? Extremely Well Prepared |
| 10. TA's management of classroom/lab environment | Very Poor ? Exceptional |
| 11. TA actively engaged students (i.e., participation, group work, questions, etc.) | Very Poor ? Exceptional |
| 12. Considering everything, the TA was an effective TA | Strongly Disagree ? Strongly Agree |
| 13. Regarding this TA's overall performance | |
| What was the greatest strength? | Free-form Response (No character limit) |
| What is the most needed improvement? | Free-form Response (No character limit) |
| 14. General comments regarding TA | Free-form Response (No character limit) |
